Tag

chef

Browsing

by Anya Regelin

Let’s get this out of the way: I cook professionally and I don’t taste my food, and I haven’t, by choice, in years. Before you start thinking that I cannot possibly be a real chef, I will tell you that I have been cooking professionally for close to thirteen years, first in restaurants, and for the past seven, privately.

So how do I do this, and more importantly why do I do this? Not tasting started as a little one-time experiment “just to see what would happen.” The practice has stuck, and now, for the most part, I have not tasted anything that I have made for my clients in over three years. Hand formed chocolate tarts, homemade artichoke ravioli, cured Hamachi with preserved lemon, truffle infused custards? Nope. Chicken Soup? Occasionally. Chicken soup can be tricky.

Back when I went to culinary school, I was taught that a good cook tasted everything — all of the time. Not doing so was akin to a writer not running spell check. (I was also taught that in the culinary-world-food-chain, private chefs were one step above caterers, essentially not cut out to hack it with the big boys, the guys who toiled night after night in professional restaurant kitchens, preferably with multiple stars after their names. I later changed my opinion about this as well.)

A little over three years ago, I was in the middle of frantically preparing a four-course dinner party for fifteen. The menu was ambitious and my clients were ultra-rich and demanded ultra-fancy food that would wow their dinner guests. These clients were also ultra-orthodox Jews and all of the food was prepared under strict Kosher guidelines, a restriction that I was incredibly new to. I was constantly manipulating recipes while crossing my fingers in the hopes that things would work out as planned. I dipped and licked out of nervousness, constantly questioning if what I was cooking was any good and if my difficult clients would ever be pleased.

Private cheffing is not like restaurant cooking. A restaurant cook typically works on a station doing one of ten things over and over again. If the first batch of brussel sprouts aren’t perfectly caramelized, you might get yelled at a little bit, but don’t worry, you have forty more orders over the course of the night to make them right. Ultimately, it’s all about repetition. A private chef, however, rarely gets more than one chance to prepare a single dish.

Having worked in the type of restaurants where it is all about producing perfection on a plate, I was having a difficult time relaxing as a private chef and trusting the cooking process. Even while working alone, I demanded the same intricate, highly stylized food that usually took a small army cooks to produce. My energy in the kitchen was charged, nervous, and frenetic, and it was affecting the quality of my food. I found myself tasting everything — constantly. Was it OK? Was there enough salt? More salt. Oh no, too much salt! Add lemon. Oh no, too much lemon! I licked, smacked, and dipped myself crazy. I was so consumed with how perfect the finished plate should look and taste that I was losing my head in the process.

That day, in the middle of preparing that intricate dinner for fifteen, I decided to change the way that I worked. Over the next few hours I paid careful attention to every step of every dish. I resisted the urge to taste to just “see how I was doing.” I drizzled olive oil and looked for color and texture. I inhaled deeply to catch subtle aromas and added a bunch of thyme. I was immediately unable to multitask. A calm fell on the kitchen.

Right before the dinner party was about to start, I lined up all of my pots and armed with a teaspoon, I sampled each one. Maybe a sauce needed a little salt. Maybe. But who am I to say what the right amount of salt is? Whenever I go to a restaurant, I’m always the first to ask for the saltshaker. (In fact, it is one of my pet peeves when a restaurant makes you ask for salt, only to be met with an eye roll from a hipster waiter who just learned how to pronounce foie gras stuffed angolotti five minutes before his shift started.)

I do realize that I am no food genius, but I started to think, Beethoven went deaf at the height of his music career, yet he continued to compose music because he trusted that what he heard in his head was the same that his audience appreciated. Not that I am comparing myself to Beethoven, but what I had was a trust issue. My obsession with the perfection of my final product was overwhelming the process of cooking in the first place. And what is cooking, after all, but a series of creative, chemical, processes? When I stopped using my sense of taste to be the first and foremost judge of “good,” my food actually got better. My dishes were more dynamic and colorful; simultaneously simple yet ambitious.

Yes, but what did the meal taste like? I have no idea. But at that dinner party, the plates came back clean.

Anya Regelin is the Deputy-Editor of The Inquisitive Eater. “Perfection on the Plate” is the first installment of The Tasteless Chef, a regular column chronicling her exploits and misadventures as a freelance private chef. 


by Kathryn Tomajan

I find the magazine shoved into my mailbox, and the first thing I notice is the image on the back cover: a gorgeous, perfect bowl of ramen. While studying food culture in Italy, I received a gift subscription to Lucky Peach magazine, the latest project from celebrity chef and New York restauranteur David Chang. I’ve been in Italy for three months and my craving for spicy Asian food is off the charts. Looking at the photo is torturous.

Front Cover
Back Cover

I pass it around to some of my classmates –not unlike sex-deprived teenage boys might pass around a single copy of Hustler– and we all groan at the sight of noodles, nori and runny egg yolk. But the lust-inducing recipes and raw nudity on the cover (ok, maybe naked chickens don’t count) is where the porn comparisons end. It is a food magazine, but not like one you’ve seen before. This one’s from the cool kids, the bad boy of the culinary world, indie publishing darling McSweeney’s and star contributors like Anthony Bourdain, Harold McGee and Ruth Reichl.

At worst, Lucky Peach is a piece of pop culture created to stroke the egos of its narcissistic creators and encourage the god-like worship of chefs. At best, it’s a high-caliber literary work from creative food professionals doing cool things with their friends. Either way you look at it, the magazine is created in the image of its makers –unruly, testosterone-driven, egotistical, inventive and obsessive. And ultimately it’s the makers, not the food, on display in Lucky Peach.

In the era of dying print publications, Lucky Peach is a 175-page publication without a single ad. (Well, actually there are two ads: one for the Lucky Peach iPad app that is still in development, and one for a McSweeney’s cookbook.) Each quarterly issue will have a theme and the first is spot on with the hippest food trend: ramen.

Lucky Peach isn’t for your average food media audience who dog-ear recipes while making grocery lists. The magazine is written in an ultra-casual tone with a more than healthy dose of profanity, slang and restaurant jargon. Its target is hard-core foodies –the kind that go to underground supper clubs, already know that ramen is the new cupcake, and hate the term foodie.  At $10 a pop, it’s pricey. Readers get a physically superior magazine with heavy matte paper and exceptional design. Readers also get a glimpse into an exclusive culinary clique.

The opening article is a travelogue of Chang and fellow editor Peter Meehan’s ramen research trip to Japan. The 16-page spread documents the drunken ramen binge interspersed with noodle-praising expletives, the idol worship of Toyko’s master ramen chefs and two accounts of Chang vomiting from overindulgence.

In one of only two pieces by women, Ruth Reichl reports on her instant ramen taste test. In a maternal tone, Reichl insists on tossing the ramen packet. “Throw out the packaged soup mix. Trust me… This is not something you want to eat.”  Yet turn the page and naughty chef Chang uses that disgusting seasoning packet in a series of instant ramen recipes including potato chip dip and a riff on the Italian classic cacio e pepe.

cacio e pepe

This use of a lowbrow ingredient is not for the sake of irony. In another article, the ingredient-driven cuisine popularized by Alice Waters –who is not a formally trained chef– is lambasted in a rambling conversation on mediocrity between Chang, Bourdain and fellow New York chef Wylie Dufresne:


Wylie: Ingredient-driven food, what the fuck does that mean?

Anthony: Okay, it means taking three or four pretty good ingredients or very good ingredients or superb ingredients and doing as little as possible-

Wylie: It’s called cooking… That farm to table bullshit… Come on. There’s just too much of it.

Anthony: Farm to table is saying right up front that it is —to use the dreaded phrase— ingredient-driven rather than chef-creativity-driven or technique-driven. It’s saying that the most important thing is where it comes from, how it was grown, who grew it, and not what you do with it. It’s basically patting yourself on the back for being there.

Wylie: But that’s not cooking. We’re talking about cooking. We are cooks. We should have a responsibility to cook. The fact that we’re talking about ingredients rather than what people are doing with the ingredients is a mistake. Do something to it. That’s showing that you have skill.

Dufresne’s diatribe on farm-to-table cuisine justifies his existence. His conclusion that ingredients are secondary to the golden touch of a skilled cook secures he and his buddies’ position as the Creators in the food universe.

The recipes in Lucky Peach echo that attitude. Heavy on technique, they require a high level of kitchen skills and are probably not for the average home cook. For example, in the introduction to one recipe Chang writes:

This recipe is not for a final dish, or something I’d put on a menu, or something that’s been fully optimized for home cooking. What it is is a blueprint for making a tonkotsu-ish broth in a short period of time—it’s more about the principle than the technique. In this case, we use a pressure cooker to extract a ton of flavor out of the bones quickly, but pressure-cooking the stock for too long also clarifies it. So this is a hybrid method, cooked partially under pressure.

Readers are privy to the ramen broth recipe from Chang’s Michelin-starred restaurant Momofuku, a guide to fresh alkaline noodles, and approximately 20 ways to cook an egg with a full-spread chart to illustrate yolk texture.

We also find more classic food writing such as a regional guide to ramen in Japan, a review of “the best potato chips in the world” and an insightful article on authenticity.  And there’s some unusual elements for a food magazine –a work of fiction by Japanese novelist Jun’ichirō Tanizaki, illustrations by award-winning cartoonist Tony Millionaire, and full-page renderings of now-legendary ramen chefs reproduced from letterpress prints– quality art and literature by anyone’s standards. Even if we never attempt a single recipe printed in Lucky Peach, we must assume they’re works of art since they’re housed in the same gallery.

Ramen Gods

No doubt Lucky Peach is fuel for the food and food celebrity obsessed. In the first issue, ramen is fetishized but it’s also analyzed, deconstructed and re-imagined. It elevates food to art, chefs to artists, and cooking to a creative process. It doesn’t make the food or its creators more accessible to us, but maybe that’s the point. Not everyone can cook, but lucky for us there are some chefs in this world that can.

 Kathryn Tomajan is studying food culture at the University of Gastronomic Sciences in Pollenzo, Italy. She is also a co-founder of Eat Retreat, a creative workshop for leaders in the food community.